Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> so Ant1 will still be maintained by some people (chalk me up for
>> that).
> 
> Me too.

Woohoo ;-)

>> Depending on future directions, I can easily imagine that we would
>> start to implement some of the expected Ant2 features in the Ant1
>> codebase.
>>
> 
> Indeed, I have a multithreading implementation just waiting to go
> in.

[...]

Then there is Nico's patch that allowed a tasklib system (about four
months old I guess). Once the mechanism for Ant2 has been defined we
should revisit it.

Stefan

Reply via email to