Bill, I don't mind. It depends on whether we feel the antrc_* scripts can make non-local changes to the environment. As it stands they have that possibility. They could have their own setlocal/endlocal if desired. If we moved endlocal, the setlocal must be moved to the beginning too.
Thoughts? -- Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cortex eBusiness http://www.cortexebusiness.com.au > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 30 January 2001 3:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/script ant.bat > > > Hi Conor, > > Thanks for applying my patch. > > Wouldn't the endlocal you added be better at the end of the file? > Although, I suppose anyone running on NT wouldn't need to call the > antrc_post.bat file anyway so it probably doesn't matter. > > -Bill Burton > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > <snip/> > > > +if not "%OS%"=="Windows_NT" goto mainEnd > > +:winNTend > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > + > > +:mainEnd > > +if exist "%HOME%\antrc_post.bat" call "%HOME%\antrc_post.bat" > > + > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
