I was thinking of modifying patternsets to accept include files in child
elements.
In the same way that you can have child <include name=> elements, I'd like
to be able to use an include where the patterns come from a file.
I have two questions
1) Should I make the change fit for public consuption (do other people want
this?)
2) Is it preferred to have
<include name=> and <include file=>
or <include name=> and <includefile name=>
or <include name=> and <includefile file=>
I'm having trouble getting CVS to work through our filewall, so I'd proably
create
a patch against that last source archive.
Will that be a problem?
