Sounds good. I also just looked at the committed text and it is a little different/better than what I submitted and I think it makes more sense to be in the binary.
d On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:40:12 +1100, Conor MacNeill wrote: >David, > >I think it should be there, so people can know where to look for >dependencies. Since all it basically does not is redirect the user to the >manual I think it can stand. The manual is clear that the jar can be there >or in the classpath, which should be clear. > >Conor > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 10:39 AM >Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant build.xml > > >Should the README still be passed on to the binary distribution? The >new README doesn't have much in it - I submitted (committed) patches >that moved most of its content to the manuals. > >Also, as it is written it implied required libraries need to be there >when they could be in the CLASSPATH as well. Maybe we just need to >update what it says to reflect this? > >d > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
