Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (4) Vote on anything in (ii), (iii) and (iv) with a one week > deadline on votes. [...] A -1 by any committer should result in > putting the corresponding stuff into bucket (v).
Some clarification, "-1 by any committer" shouldn't mean that users don't have a say in this - if at all possible I wouldn't want to overrule a user veto on anything, but in the end its just the committers votes that really count. > (5) Parallel to (4) start discussion on (v) with two weeks of > discussion and a vote after that. [...] > > (6) Hash out the details for (iv) in discussions - again with a > deadline and voting after that, When looking through the "Action Items" in <http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html> I think we are talking about "Product Changes" here - with the effect that votes are subject to lazy consensus, i.e. a -1 by a committer is a veto. Stefan
