on 3/6/01 5:11 PM, "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Not a flame, but it is feedback: >> >> I wouldn't call it an "article", I would call it a "weird rant" that isn't >> very well written (or even spell checked: summarize [sic]). > > Jon, it meets my *internationalised* spelling vocabulary just fine. with an > australian origin it would pass the local spell checker too. It should be > proofread a couple of times more though. See my correction email. > As to the comments, well, they opinions and it is hard to call them invalid. Eh? I didn't call the opinions invalid nor did anyone else here. > But I do use it for C# dev and perl/web site deployment, so the claim of > being 'java only' isnt true. Its only extensible in Java, but deployment > problems are deployment problems, regardless of language. Yup. -jon
