> Ideally, Ant should support this level of modularity gracefully. > Otherwise, it's only a pseudo-modular build tool. Just like > cutting-and-pasting code from a Visual Basic template file into the > current project, it's just not what I would term "correct". IMHO. I disagree.
I have all the build,init,dist,clean targets in common files. I can create a new project build file in under fives minutes by filling in the blanks. If you want a better solution I would suggest something that generated the build files for you. You give a list of projects and the their packages and it builds the files for you. That way no problems with target duplication. The simpler the solution is the better and at the moment I think ant has not got too complex for it to remain useful. But thats just my 0.02c ($NZ which is not really worth much.) Michael --- BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK --- Version 3.12 GCS d+(-) s:- a-- C++(+++)$ UL++++(H)(S)$ P+++$ L+++$>++++ E--- W++ N++ o++ K? !w() O? !M V? PS+ PE+++ Y+ t+ 5++ X++ R(+) !tv b++(++++) D++ G>++ e++> h--()(*) r+ y+() --- END GEEK CODE BLOCK --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
