Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The list should remove itself from the bussiness of judging and > debating whether a task is worth having or not. There should be a > repository where anyone and everyone can submit their "work of art" > tasks.
This is already in the wish list - and one of my biggest wishes. I think, we all generally agree that a separate module for contributions is needed, but we will need rules for this (every committer would have commit access to all tasks in this module - but when/how may he/she use it, what are the rules for releasing a version of a task ...). > The only debate on the list should be whether a contribution is good > enough and powerful enough as to make it into the official core jars Not sure, whether the notion of "good enough" is a good measure for core jars - sounds a little bit (how do you say in the US?, "politically challenging") discriminating. Something like "will this be useful for the average build environment or is it a special case tool" - which is vague enough - seems more appropriate. > or about changes to the core architecture. Agreed - but I think ant-dev should serve as the discussion list for the ant-contrib module as well. I wouldn't want to have a separate user list for the contrib stuff either (well, we probably wouldn't need a user list for the core anyway). Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
