Tim Vernum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Donald (21 March 2001 8:57 PM) wrote:
>> Whether stated or stated almost all of the developers have always >> seen declarativeness as an aim (whether it is achieved is another >> thing altogether). > > I am fairly familiar with the view of the committers, You are? I'm not 8-) and I'm not sure whether there is a "view of the committers" - I really expect the committers to disagree on many of the "controversal" stuff from the wish list. > Since that will end up being the collective view of the current > committers, we can all make good guesses as to what it will be, but > I do think that having it stated somewhere is worthwhile. Yes - once we know what the "collective view of the current committers", we can put that statement together and vote on it. > How will the feature requests be evaluated? Technically by voting. I'm not sure whether every committer will use the same measures to cast her/his vote. >> Umm server solution ??? > > It's in the Jakarta mission statement. which has been widened to something like " ... and related tools" AFAIK, the website needs an update. Stefan
