David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>* keep build file syntax as compatible to Ant1 as possible - >> i.e. don't break something just because we can. >> > > against (or should I just put -1 even thought I am not a committer?) > > Why? Because I think it should be replaced with an XSLT from Ant1 to > Ant2.
This is not precluded by the statement above. All it says (and see the "as possible" in there) is that we should try to keep as close to the current syntax as possible. I see no need to rename <target> for example. The transition from Ant1 to Ant2 should be possible without XSLT (but manual adjustments) for simple cases IMHO. Stefan
