At 10:03 28/3/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>Do you mean whoever expands the ${} should look whether the referenced
>object has a toAntAttributeString() method and invoke this - and fall
>back to toString if it doesn't? Why?
or we could avoid the whole issue together via converters ;) Whatever
policy someone wants to implement could be implemented then ;)
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
