--- Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * allow sequence to be specified in depends attribute or enhance > > antcall to work with current list of executed targets > > I don't think we should guarantee sequence. If the sequence is required, > it can be set up but appropiate depends relationships.
I always assumed that the order in which you specified the targets in the "depends" attribute was in fact the sequence in which they were executed, and when I run targets that have a list of dependencies, I've never seen it not execute them in that order -- has that just been luck? In any case, I'm definitely +1 for having that be how it works. > > * Make if/unless attributes to check for the value of a property, not > > only its existance. As Pete would say, +1000000000 :) Diane ===== ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
