At 10:37 2/4/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> When it is a container task or a dynamic one like proposed for
>> property. ie
>>
>> <if test="...">
>> <some-other-task/>
>> </fi>
>
>I still don't get it, sorry. Somehow If.createTask("some-other-task")
>or similar would have been called anyway, wouldn't it?
Okay .. now I don't get it ;)
If we use our current model it is impossible for task to contain arbitrary
sub-elements. If instead the task gets passed a full DOM/TOM/Object tree it
can interpret the tree itself in a completely random way ;) If you have a
look at mymidon proposal you will see that the property task did just that.
I can't see another clean way of doing containerships (considering that in
our case the contained objects are themselves proxy representations of
other tasks).
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
