Michael McCallum wrote: > ... > Yes. Ant needs to be flexible so it can complement tools that are out there. > So if tool X needs to do token replacement with Tokens wrapped in @, $, % or > even > START/END then it should be supported in some way.
Why would Ant need to do token replacement in the style of tool X? Wouldn't you put Ant-style tokens in a file, replace them using Ant, and then have a X-style file to be processed by tool X? Or do you really want Ant to be able to process tokens that tool X could have processed? Daniel -- Daniel Barclay Digital Focus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
