At 08:35 9/5/01 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote: >> If there's no end user difference, then Ant should use the one that simplest >> for the developer. > >Both are simple. Both offer the same features. If anything one should go >away and they should be combined.
hell yes! I tried three times to do this - Ceki no goed the first to and no replied to the last. >> But does it do everything that we need? >> (Honest question) > >I think so. But I'm biased, I only have two perfectly working systems >implementing this approach. neither of those systems are ant though ... or have requirements anything like ant .... do they ? Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
