At 04:29 PM 5/18/01 -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote: >Why not either: >- let any task appear at the top level, or
that was -1ed ages ago as could lead to heaps of complexity. It could also lead to target-less scripts. >- define an initialization target (when a target has some distinguished > name like "init" or something, every other target implicitly depends > on it) This was done and users screamed for blood ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
