On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 20:26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have yet to discuss any of the higher order aspects such as those > > needed by GUMP. They are higher order as they require cooperation > > from the task to complete the action. > > In case of the CLASSPATH aspect, this can probably be solved best if > you remove all CLASSPATH related stuff from the tasks completely - > make the tasks rely on the aspect and you don't need cooperation at > all. > > This probably means we need child elements that belong to aspects > (<ant:classpath> which would just be a nicer way to write the > corresponding attribute).
I don't get that at all - can you explain? Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
