Ok, I must have taken stupid pills this morning because I can't figure out what just happened with this bug.
I see that the status changed to RESOLVED, but the comments don't indicate what happened. Please respond to me directly (or in addition) since I don't currently monitor ant-dev. Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1380 > > *** shadow/1380 Thu Jun 21 07:25:54 2001 > --- shadow/1380.tmp.24500 Wed Jul 4 13:29:28 2001 > *************** > *** 2,11 **** > | I think that having conditional fails make more robust build files. > | > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Bug #: 1380 Product: Ant > | > ! | Status: NEW Version: 1.3 > | > ! | Resolution: Platform: All > | > | Severity: Enhancement OS/Version: All > | > ! | Priority: Component: Core tasks > | > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > --- 2,11 ---- > | I think that having conditional fails make more robust build files. > | > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Bug #: 1380 Product: Ant > | > ! | Status: RESOLVED Version: 1.3 > | > ! | Resolution: REMIND Platform: All > | > | Severity: Enhancement OS/Version: All > | > ! | Priority: High Component: Core tasks > | > > +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > *************** > *** 36,39 **** > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-06-21 07:25 ------- > ! *** Bug 1997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > --- 36,51 ---- > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-06-21 07:25 ------- > ! *** Bug 1997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > ! > ! ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-07-04 13:29 ------- > ! The problem I'm having with this issue is that we don't allow if/unless on > any > ! other tasks. Why should we make an exception for this one? I agree that > for > ! the particular use case it is a useful enhancement; I'm not a huge fan of > having > ! a million targets to inform a use of what error they have in a file. > However, > ! I'm not sure that this use case outweighs our desire to remain consistent > in our > ! use of if/unless (Please don't laugh... :-). > ! > ! I think this one might have to wait to be reevaluated for Ant2. > ! > ! Comments? -- Larry V. Streepy, Jr. Chief Technical Officer and VP of Engineering Health Language, Inc. -- "We speak the language of healthcare" 970/626-5028 (office) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 970/626-4425 (fax) http://www.healthlanguage.com
