On Thu, 02 Aug 2001, Craeg K. Strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is why you mentioned the possibility of including both FileSets > and FileLists, is it? Now I get it.
Good ;-) > - you could have some sort of option that would make > DirectoryScanner return explicitly-named files even if they did not > exist Not DirectoryScanner's responsibilty IMHO, it is supposed to discover files that follow certain patterns - not to list arbitrary files. > - you could create a new DataType of ExplicitFileList or something > that accepted no wildcards Yep. > - you could use FileSets, but have them behave a little differently > in the case of <dependset> I wouldn't like that too much either, but it is not without precedent, see <zipfileset> and <tarfileset>, although they just "decorate" plain filesets. Stefan
