Christoph, Let me add a +1. Sorry, I figured this had lazy approval.
Conor > -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Wilhelms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 20 August 2001 4:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Logo Decision process > > > Of course you can, for there was just a single +1 vote (mine) on > the process > and schedule I proposed. That means, that not enough committers agreed to > the process and another proposal has to be made and to be voted. Feel free > to submit. I think I'll come up with a new schedule-proposal next > week! IMHO > we need to finsh this task ASAP :-)! > > Cheers, > Chris > > > so, can I still mail in a logo sunday night? or when is the > > exact deadline? > > > > Thank you, > > Joris > > > > Christoph Wilhelms wrote: > > > Feel free, to arrange groups, then! I do NOT want to have the > > responsibility > > > for the groups. Generally I'd -0 the group-topic for I have > > some concerns, > > > but I do not veto at all! > > > > > > One thing is important to me: We should speed up with the > > decision project, > > > to make shure, that we do not lose the logo contributers, > > because they might > > > think, that we aren't interested in a logo anymore! An IMHO we > > need these > > > contributers after we decided on a logo, because we might need other > > > versions of the logo: smaller, bigger version, "build by" versions, > > > vectoriced versions for beeing printed in mags or adds or > > apache-T-shirts > > > ;-) and version I can't think of ATM! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chris > > > > > > > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > From: Christoph Wilhelms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the families of logos: > > > > > In some cases its easy to find groups, but in some it isn't. > > > > > I really do not > > > > > want to decide to group them... For instance there are 2 > > > > > similar logos with > > > > > gray and red and a big ANT on it (from Rubus). I really like > > > > > the first one, > > > > > but dislike the second one. what vote should i give, if they > > > > > are in the same > > > > > family! Due to that reason I'd -0.5 the "families-idea" > > > > > > > > I do not see the problem you have with the family round of > > > > votes. What has > > > > been suggested is to have a first round where we pick a > > > > family and then a > > > > second round to pick ONE of the logos from the winning > > > > family. A family will > > > > be constitutes only by logos of the same submitter that have SMALL > > > > variations between them (colors, additional text, etc). There > > > > are several > > > > logos that can be easily cathegorized that way. > >
