Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Couldn't spot the reason - can anyone enlighten me? > > "All tasks or no task" and "all tasks" has been rejected IIRC. > > Stefan
That was pretty much my position. I agreed with the person who was pushing for if/unless on fail that it would make life a lot easier in the case of wanting to kill the build early if a particular resource was missing. My concern, howevere, was opening up that slippery slope, so my -1. That being said, I'm willing to conceed that if we get a concensus vote on changing fail to have if/unless, I'll go along with it. Its an unusual enough situation that an exception can be justified, and seeing as we "thought police" are vigorously on the prowl, it shouldn't go any further. :-) Glenn McAllister SOMA Networks, Inc.
