----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 07:59 Subject: Re: Problem with JUnit's TestCase.getName change
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Ingmar Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But for 1.5 or even 2.0, I would not choose the slow reflection, > > instead use the getName() method. > > I agree for Ant2, and could be convinced for Ant 1.5 ;-) ok, here is another argument for moving to junit3.7 in ant 1.5: -the assert() call in junit <3.7 doesnt work in java1.4 with assert in the languag enabled, you have to use TestCase.assertTrue() instead. Which means for ant to build under java1.4 with source=1.4 we would need to migrate all junit tests which use the old assert() method to the new one. And here are the counterpoints -we dont need to build ant with java1.4 asserts turned on, cos we cant put them in the source anyway -what if someone needs to use an older version of ant? Steve ps: why do Junit keep changing their methods all the time?
