On Sat, 3 Nov 2001 13:54, Magesh Umasankar wrote: > On Sat, 03 Nov 2001 Peter Donald wrote : > > > I should note that I changed all protected members to > > private. Tell me if this causes any issues ;) > > No, it doesn't cause any issues - the idea was to open > up the methods that may be overridden if at all a task > is going to be extending this one in the future...
if the need arises we can deal with it then. Making them private makes it easier evolve because no one will try to use them without making us aware of it. > I had noticed s small problem after I had submitted this > task and I had followed it up with a revision. I see > that the revision did not get applied. Here is a patch > that will get rid of this bug. applied. -- Cheers, Pete *-------------------------------------* | Does the name `Pavlov' ring a bell? | *-------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
