On Wed, 7 Nov 2001 01:34, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Strange routing or name server problems today again, haven't received > any mails for hours ... I think it is not an Apache problem this time > as I can see mails getting into the archives. > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > if( node is one of "import", "projectref" or "aspect" ) > >> > >> Project and Target translate into Ant's object model directly, I'm > >> not sure the same is true for the things you mention. > > > > Well I think they do and in fact have modeled them as part of > > project model in proposal. (with the exception of aspect which I am > > still not decided on). I am interested to hear why you doon't > > consider them part of the model. > > Whenever you (Peter, Jose Alberto and Conor) have been talking about > "projectref", I found one reason or another to stop following the > thread, so I'm not really sure we are all talking about the same thing > here. Consequently I'm not sure whether the "projectref" constitutes > a part of the object model or just modifies it (by adding another > tree). > > If "import" is importing a task library, all this thing does is adding > tasks (and all the other things) to the registry - I don't see that as > part of the object model itself either.
do you see java imports as part of the "object model" of a Java file ? > > >> Back to tasks and types - I sense consensus building up for "allow > >> everything to live outside of targets". > > > > hello script land! > > 8-) > > Stefan -- Cheers, Pete -------------------------------------------------- The fact that nobody understands you doesn't mean you're an artist. -------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
