Soo below.. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 3:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: chgrp, chown, chmod, chrights + question ;) > > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > but since backward compatibility is necessary, I could create the > > chgrp and chown tasks (simple copies of chmod) and integrate the 3 > > in the chrights task. > > As there is no single chgrp task, there is no need for having a > separate task IMHO. Do you exepect chrights to use a similar sytax > like chmod did?
I planned a lot of copy and past in there yes ;)) > If so, we could get away with making chmod an alias > name for chrights (and issue a deprecation warning if somebody uses > that name). I'm in favour of that too.. > > d) Let's deprecate the chown and go for the chrights > > Yes. > > 2) If everyone prefers a or c, I would prefer to minimize code and > > execute the task chmod/chown/chgrp from the chrights task. > > Don't know whether this actually is necessary, see above. > > > but couldn't find a clean way to do that from my code. > > There are a couple of tasks that do similar things, see how <genkey> > (ab)uses <exec> for example. I'll see what these tasks do.. Thanx for the reply.. Mvgr, Martin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
