On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:27, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Where is the templating capability? We cannot keep on vetoing proposals > > > because templating is considered to be the right solution, and then do > > > nothing about providing the templates. > > > > who said we have done nothing. I know I have provided at least 5 > > different possible implementations, each testing different features. Some > > good, some bad. > > Maybe is because it was over a year ago, or something. Can you please point > me to those implementations of *templates* (or on the archives)? I have > noticed many of your proposals in other matters of ANT2 but I do not > remember much about *specifics* with respect to templates.
proposal/myrmidon > As I said, where are they. If this is a sleeping thread for a year lets > revive it and really see what you are proposing with real test cases to > talk about. > > I would like to see: > > (1) How to write <foreach> functionality over a fileset (or equivalent). > (2) How to write <javaon> functionality. loaded questions. Assumes we need this functionality. While XSLT could provide this I don't think they are needed given (3) > (3) How to write new pseudo-tasks that are defined as the sequential > execution of existing tasks with ways to pass arguments. See message with Subject "Re: Question about properties and ant2" on 14th September. > (4) How the whole thing can be invoked toguether. Is it more that > ant -f buildfile target In proposal it is done by file extension. IIRC it is ant -f buildfile.ati target > > > In the mean time more and more people go on using things like the > > > <foreach> task, which they have to fetch from somewere else. > > > > and ... > > It means we will not be able to just tell people to abandon it and go > change everything nor just tell them "sorry you should have waited until we > made our minds". The longer the wait the larger the headache will be. Right. But is "talk-talk" going to get us any closer to a solution to this problem? Of course not. Only way to get closer to solution is "walk-walk", people actually start working together and implementing things. I have no problem doing the work - hell in worst case I would do it all if I had too - problem is "design by committee" on a tool that is "good enough" at the moment. No one agree or even trys to work together - can you guess the end result ? I can. Egos are great things - no? -- Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------------* | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want | | to test a man's character, give him power." | | -Abraham Lincoln | *------------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
