DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4886>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4886 JUnit task enhancement ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-15 11:14 ------- This is an interesting idea; using javadoc attributes to bind to test cases. By doing so you actually add a piece of information which doctools can use, as well as ant. I''ll leave it to others to decide whether this patch should be committed, but I would like to recommend that a structured tag in ant namespace gets used (e.h. @ant:junittest), or maybe a junit one. That way an xdoclet for the namespace can handle those tags too, and other doclets wont. Incidentally, what is wrong with having the unit tests in a separate package :- <include name="com/iseran/nordwand/model/unittests/*Test.java"/> Is is because you need access to package level methods? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
