From: "Jon Skeet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: "Jon Skeet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Does this really makes any sense? What is there for advance > > research, do you mean to say that an Apache group cannot think > > on two or three product generations for now? > > Are we condemed to only look one major release ahead? > > Well, they can do research with random codenames, of course, but I think > when things start becoming more concrete, it makes sense to assign a > version number. >
But we started using the name ANT2, what a year and a half ago? As far as I know there is no concrete architecture design that has been voted, the only thing done is a list of features we would like (more or less). That can hardly be catalogued as CONCRETE. The only design is whatever Donald has done which I have never seen it been discussed at any length or in detail. Are all the committers happy with his design? Do you all understand and are ready to approve it? I am not trying to pass judgement on the code, but can we say we have things CONCRETE? Jose Alberto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
