Thank you steve for your long and useful answer !
(see my answers)
At 17:41 26/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Cyrille Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:48 AM Subject: [PATCH] ejb-jar/jonas element again
.....
We do need somebody else to play with this before I am happy commiting it, even though I agree that a jonas task would be a worthy addition to Ant -or the JOnAS codebase.
Many JOnAS users work with Ant. I will ask to this people to play with the new element,
so I will send their feedbacks to this mailing list.
I had been a bit concerned about the fact that JOnAS is GPL, and we cant have GPL code in the Apache source tree, but since you are only calling it via a <java> call I think we should be ok on that. Correct?
JOnAS isn't GPL. JOnAS license is close to the Mozilla Public License version 1.1 (MPL1.1)
The IPlanet, WebLogic and WebSphere element use a <java> call to run their own tools which are not OpenSource.
So I think, there is no problem.
So the primary issue is that it'd be nice to get some input from other JOnAS users. If we dont, well, we could commit it and then field the feedback which will come in. Like most optional tasks which arent testable on most systems its hard to keep these tasks alive without the involvement of the original author and users.
Be sure the JOnAS team and I will maintain the task, and will not let it die.
Before we get that far, there are some bits in the code that, while workable, are not really what we want in the codebase: .....
So, why not make the changes, add a junit test class which stresses the task and start harassing us a week or so into January, when people are back from their holidays.
Thank you for all your remarks. I would do my best, to make the better task I can.
I hope my work will be commited in January.
Thank you again for all your advices.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
