> -----Original Message----- > From: Cyrille Morvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As Conor told you, I can't delivrate a separate package for > the jonas task. > Because I modified the EjbJar.class. > > JOnAS users are not Ant expert. I wanted to facilitate them Ant's use. > That's why I decided to distribute the whole package. Delivering a jar w/ all ejb related tasks and w/ a modified default.properties in the jar and setting it in the system classpath to override the delivered tasks is IMHO way more simple and less risky. It is not rare to have some users using ant.jar v 1.x w/ an optional.jar v1.y because they 'forget it', so it is risky to me to add another deliverable in the field. > I don't think that I broke the rules or the licence. > My first goal was to help JOnAS developers to test the jonas > element and discover Ant. I think it would be better as well to post your request in ant-user and to ask for feedback with an explicit subject in your mail. Requesting feedback from users in mail being a reply to a patch submission...is probably not hitting a single target. Just imagine that I have about a dozen of replies for something as widely use as JUnit. > I don't understand your reaction, and I hope to not to have > been harmful to you or to Ant. It's only a tracability issue. No sweat but IMHO you'd better avoid it and certainly never do this where you will be working in the future or you will shoot yourself in the foot w/ a nuclear bomb. :) Stephane -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
