On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:25, Adam Murdoch wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Vernum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 January 2002 9:37 AM > > To: 'Ant Developers List' > > Subject: RE: Ant2 VFS Proposal > > > > > > I know I'm about to open up a can of worms here... > > > > But this seems like a sure thing for commons. > > Absolutely. > > I think a good plan would be to let it mature for a while as part of the > Ant 2 work, and then move it across to commons at some point in the future > (maybe before Ant 2 is finished, maybe after). At this stage there isn't > much more to it than a few emails and a proof-of-concept or two. > > > If the VFS really Ant specific? > > Bits of it will be. Most of it will be reusable, hopefully. I'm > definitely going to use it outside Ant. Provided we let it evolve with > reusability in mind, then I don't think there's any real problem with it > living in the Ant tree for a while longer.
Put it into org.apache.aut.vfs for the time being as all the aut package should be largely independent of ant. It can migrate somewhere else later. -- Cheers, Pete *--------------------------------------------------* | Wise men don't need advice. Fools don't take it. | | -Benjamin Franklin | *--------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
