On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:04, Stephane Bailliez wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > * Is it also possible to disable "Local constructor is unused > > > > (5.36)." when > > > > the constructor is private and the class is final ? > > > > > > Not that I know of, I may have to disable this rule and implement a new > > > rule myself. > > Though I would say that this is not because the class is final and the > constructor private that it should be disabled...I'd rather do this for a > helper class that contains only static methods no ?
works for me ;) > > > > * Also is it possible to disable "Formal parameter elements is unused > > > > (5.36)." when the method is an implementation of method > > > > inherited from an interface? > > > > > > I don't get it, how would you express this rule ? > > > > Something like > > [...] > > While I understand what you want you want to avoid with this (typically > adapters), I'm not sure at what could be the side effects, though a unused > formal parameter is no big deal. Well at some point in the future I want to get a 0 violations policy happening. However as I never intend to "fix" this case I would never be able to achieve 0 violations because it would always be there ;) -- Cheers, Pete ------------------------------------------------------------ I just got lost in thought... It was unfamiliar territory. ------------------------------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
