On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 23:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /**
> * A general-purpose type definition.
> *
> * @author <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Adam Murdoch</a>
> */
> public class GeneralTypeDefinition
> extends TypeDefinition
> {
> private String m_name;
vs
> public abstract class TypeDefinition
> {
Is there any need to separate out the above two classes? From the looks of
things - no - but is there something else you have in mind?
> /**
> * A base class for tests for the default components.
> *
> * @author <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Adam Murdoch</a>
> */
> public class ComponentTestBase extends TestCase
Do you want to rename this to AbstractComponentTest because that fits in with
the naming patterns of swing (which is consistent with the rest of the
myrmidon codebase).
--
Cheers,
Pete
--------------------------------
My opinions may have changed,
but not the fact that I am right
--------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
