On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Adam Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * What do we do with the <mimemail> task? Deprecate it?
+1 > * The refactored task is in a new package (taskdefs.email). Do we > need to keep the old task classes hanging around? Probably yes. There could be people that extend from it. > * The current <mail> task ignores the message attribute if one or > more files are specified. Is this a bug? If we call it a bug, we can change the behavior without breaking backwards compatibility ;-) Honestly, I don't know. > * Any problems with making the default mime, uuencode, plain in that > order? +1 for doing it that way (we could throw in an option for preferred encoding). Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
