On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:04, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Why people would want to use one nightly build and adapt to it but >> not want to adapt to yet another nightly build. > > the majority of people don't know they are using a nightly ? So don't impose it on them - ahh, the benefits of putting jars into CVS. I'm in favor of not supporting this style of development (rely on alpha code and don't track the development list of the product in question). > However the change has been too long in codebase to completely > remove. I can follow your reasoning to a certain degree, but I'm afraid this would be going to set a precedent as it almost forces us to veto any changes until we've voted on attribute names or something. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
