Tim Vernum wrote:
From: Adam Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As far as I can tell, according to the sections
of the JLS that they cite, it's the audit tool that's got the modifiers in
the wrong order, not our code.
The javadoc for java.lang.reflect.Field#toString() says:
<BLOCKQUOTE> The modifiers are placed in canonical order as specified by "The Java Language Specification". This is public, protected or private first, and then other modifiers in the following order: static, final, transient, volatile <BLOCKQUOTE>
The audit tool is complaining http://icarus.apache.org/~sbailliez/jakarta-ant/proposal/myrmidon/audit/org/apache/aut/vfs/FileType.html
about the following line: public static final FileType FOLDER = new FileType( REZ.getString( "folder.name" ) );
I don't think that is what it is complaining about or it would have flagged this line in the same file
private final static Resources REZ =
ResourceManager.getPackageResources( FileType.class );
I'd say it is complaining about the placement of fields after methods. See section 3.1.3 of the Sun coding conventions.
Conor
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
