From: "Jon Skeet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1) Do people think this would actually be > helpful? I suspect that a lot of the time > it would be trivial stuff - stuff where > the method name isn't *quite* clear enough, > but 10 seconds of looking at the code makes > it obvious what's intended. -1 to change the name of a non-private method that has been released. -1 to change name of methods unless we have a really really good reason. It will be too much pain just for aesthetics. If the method name appears not upto the mark, please consider improving the documentation so that the real intent of the method is exposed. > Is it worth spending that extra time (not Adding documentation wherever it is lacking appears worthwhile to me. However, changing method names does not ;-( > 2) Which version should I do this on? If I > attack the current CVS main tree, a lot of > the work in Ant2 will be missed - but if I > attack the proposal tree, I suspect a lot > of things are prone to change there anyway. Please go against the main trunk. > Any thoughts welcome. Take a look at BugZilla. There are a few enhancement requests and bug reports that have been out there for a long time, but none have come up with the necessary patches yet. Perhaps, you could spend your energy on some of those? > Jon Thanks for your offer to help. Cheers, Magesh ********************************************* * You need a calendar, not a stopwatch to * * measure its performance. * ********************************************* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
