On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 10:31, Bill Burton wrote: > In of itself, the above modifications alone will not completely solve the > problem as an attribute may still be called with a blank value but it > would still be very useful in a significant number of cases. Over time, > tasks could be modified to support ignoring attributes with blank values > where appropriate provided this doesn't affect backward compatibility.
Rather than doing this which I consider a little hacky - it would be much nicer to allow users to use a full templating language (XSLT, Velocity or something else) to do templating like this. -- Cheers, Pete -------------------------------------------------- "An intellectual is someone who has been educated beyond their intelligence." -------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
