On Tuesday 26 March 2002 19:20 pm, Dominique Devienne wrote: > This may sound like a very silly question to some I'm sure, but why aren't > some of the bugs reported against 1.4.1 corrected, and a 1.4.2 or 1.4.1.p1 > made available? How often someone writes "yep, it's fixed or already fixed > in CVS and/or 1.5a". I believe that simple bug fixes to existing tasks or > docs should also go against 1.4.1. Most of us need or have no choice but to > use released versions of ANT for various reasons. Fixing the latest > released version (1.4.1) to some extend until the 1.5 becomes prime time > makes sense to me. > > I've just fell into the source="1.4" bug of <javac> again (the attribute is > ignored!) with 1.4.1 official, and thought about asking. --DD
In the case that none of the dev team would like to deal with this "old stuff", i still have a "working interest" in 1.4, and would be honored to take this on. And, i *promise*, none of my patches would sneek in without official devteam approval ;). i could work out of a separate CVS tree, if that made people more comfortable. ----- stephan Generic Unix Computer Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Office: +49 (89) �552 92 862 Handy: �+49 (179) 211 97 67 "...control is a degree of inhibition, and a system which is perfectly inhibited is completely frozen." -- Alan W. Watts -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
