--- Diane Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > This is really a bad bug. > > [snip] > > What I would like to do is to add a new > command-line > > option (and acompaning magic property) called > "-once" > > what this would do is treat the list of targets in > the > > command line as follows: > > > > ant -once t1 t2 t3 t4 > > [snip] > > Thoughts? > > If it's a bad bug, then it should be fixed, not put > on the user to work > around it with a flag. > True about fixing it. But I am not sure if we can witout major changes all over the place, so I am not holding my breath.
With respect to -once, bug or no bug, I think it has merit (actually it should have been the behaviour from the start, but it is too late for that (ANT2?)). The functionality would all be quite good for <ant> since will *reduce* te need for multiple <ant> (to only the cases when you need different parameters). Does anyone think there is something bad about it? Jose Alberto __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
