Don't get me wrong... personally fine with the change that was made. I vote to leave it as it is now with it not extending MatchingTask. :)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:00 AM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs UpToDate.java > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This is picking nits, but is it possible that someone has subclassed > > UpToDate and relies on MatchingTask stuff? > > Possible, yes. > > What shall we do? > > <uptodate targetfile="foo"> > <include name="**/*.bar" /> > </uptodate> > > will not exactly do what one might expect if we leave it as a > MatchingTask. > > The only other option I see is to make it a real MatchingTask, > i.e. use the implicit FileSet as if it was specified by a > <sourcefiles> element. > > Stefan > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
