DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9199>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9199 class compiles with javac but gives class not found errors in javadoc, with same classpath Summary: class compiles with javac but gives class not found errors in javadoc, with same classpath Product: Ant Version: 1.4.1 Platform: PC URL: http://www.aaa.net.au/campbell/junk.jar OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Core tasks AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ant's <javac> behaviour seems to be that it allows classes to use java libraries that are not specified in the classpath in the build.xml, but are part of the ant distribution. Ant's <javadoc> behaviour seems to be the reverse. Thus, if you have a class that uses something from crimson.jar, which is included in the ant distro, then it will compile without being specified on the classpath, but javadoc will yield class not found. This seems wrong. I think they should be consistent. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
