Peter Donald wrote:
> 
> At 08:03 PM 7/11/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> >--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > It seems many commiters feel supporting JDK1.1 is no longer necesary
> > > and having ant1.5 the last one supporting it is reasonable. All it
> > > takes is a vote.
> >
> >I thought the idea was to keep Ant1.x 1.1-compatible, and make the break
> >at Ant2.
> 
> That was my understanding aswell.
> 

I believe from what I have read, that this was voted on, but like an act
of congress (in the US) it really only takes another vote (sometimes by
a higher %) to overide it so permanance and deadlines are somewhat of a
phantom concept.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to