----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > > > > > Does someone know the problem here ? I haven't follow the latest > > discussion > > > about jspc. > > > > > I'll try to add some stack traces in jasper. It's most likely a problem > with the classpath - and <javac> doesn't find the compiler ( tools.jar ). a '1' error means that java isnt getting as far as running jasper, I think. > > > The other issue is that CVS_HEAD version of jasperc now has a *different* > > name mangling policy than the 4.0 version. I can change the code in the jspc > > stuff, but I'd like know why it is changing and how stable it will be in > > future. > > Good question :-) > > I have a feeling it won't change in the future, most issues have been > solved ( the last one was the $ that caused jikes to complain ). The > goal was to have smaller and more predictible names. So the current algorithm is name -> name_jsp.java, with mutation of non-classname things. And this is aligned with what tomcat4.1 expects inside, so can be used for precompilation, right? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
