On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Nick Pellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been looking at XSLTProcess and have started bringing > XMLValidate up to paar. Should XMLValidate handle the factory > configuration exactly the same way as the XSLT task?
In a similar way would be prefered, what would need to be different in your opinion? > I am using an XSLTProcess.Factory, however, should I rework > XMLValidate so that it configures the Liason in the same as > XSLTProcessor ? Is that necessary IYO? > viz, XSLT uses a "processor" attribute and XMLValidate uses just a > "className", where "processor" can be "trax" etc. They serve a bit different purposes. The processor attribute - if XMLValidate had one - could hold some shortcuts for well known parsers (i.e. crimson, xerces, aelfred, xerces1?), but that would only be sugar IMHO. > Or should XMLValidate provide both mechanisms for setting the > processor in the future? We need to keep the old one for backwards compatibility. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
