I don't know of any tasks that set hidden datatypes. So in that respect you'd be going off the beaten path. A "well behaved" datatype would be something that a user would specify explicitly:

        <myDatatype id="a.datatype" someAttribute="whatever"/>

And then later refer to it by refid="a.datatype".

        Erik


Shackelford, John-Mason wrote:
Erik,


I think you'll have to use your best judgement on how to do this - but you could still set a project-scoped datatype from within your task that later tasks could see, and the user would never see an actual datatype declaration.


Thanks, that helps. I really don't want to be wacky, so understanding that
this is a legitimate use of a project-scoped datatype will help me move
ahead with a little more confidence. I am grateful to have ant and want very
much to make a meaningful contribution, but if my code is too far afield it
won't be of use to anyone.


John-Mason Shackelford

Software Developer
NCS Pearson - Measurement Services
2510 North Dodge St.
Iowa City, IA 52245
319-354-9200x6214
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**************************************************************************** This email may contain confidential material. If you were not an intended recipient, Please notify the sender and delete all copies. We may monitor email to and from our network. ****************************************************************************

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>






-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to