DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12820>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12820 inheritRefs is broken ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-25 16:30 ------- Is not set to null, but to an "unconfigured" instance. Unconfigured means that the attribute setters have not been called. I know this sounds wrong, but that is the way Ant has been instantiating tasks and data-types ever since. Some things depend on references being available even if the corresponding targets have not been called (see the second example in <script>'s documentation). This is the reason why I didn't even bother to implement inheritrefs for <antcall> in the first version (it will inherit nothing, as everything has been defined already). But this is not a bug, but a feature of Ant. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
