Hello,
It's me again, well, I've had a look too to the Java implementation
of the isByte method and I took care of your remarks to reimplement
it (thank you). So here are the results:
old method from Commons Validator :
public static boolean isByte(String value) {
return formatByte(value) != null;
}
public static Byte formatByte(String value) {
Byte result = null;
try {
result = new Byte(value);
} catch (Exception e) {
}
return result;
}
And the new one which do exactly what is needed, that's to
say return true or false and doesn't throw any exception:
public static final boolean isByte( String s )
{
// should never happen in JOE
if( s == null )
return false;
int result = 0;
boolean negative = false;
int i = 0;
int max = s.length();
int limit;
int multmin;
int digit;
if( max > 0 )
{
if( s.charAt( 0 ) == '-' )
{
negative = true;
limit = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
i++;
}
else
{
limit = -Integer.MAX_VALUE;
}
multmin = limit / 10; // radix
if( i < max )
{
digit = Character.digit( s.charAt( i++ ), 10 ); // radix
if( digit < 0 )
return false;
else
result = -digit;
}
while( i < max )
{
// Accumulating negatively avoids surprises near MAX_VALUE
digit = Character.digit(s.charAt(i++),10); // radix
if( digit < 0 )
return false;
if( result < multmin )
return false;
result *= 10; // radix
if( result < limit + digit )
return false;
result -= digit;
}
}
else
return false;
if( negative )
{
if( i > 1 )
return !(result < Byte.MIN_VALUE || result > Byte.MAX_VALUE );
else
return false; /* Only got "-" */
}
else
return !(-result < Byte.MIN_VALUE || -result > Byte.MAX_VALUE );
}
And the results for this test:
System.out.println((new java.util.Date()).getTime()+"");
for( int i = 0; i < 100000; i++ )
{
isByteApache( "300" );
isByteApache( "5" );
}
System.out.println((new java.util.Date()).getTime()+"");
for( int i = 0; i < 100000; i++ )
{
isByte( "300" );
isByte( "5" );
}
System.out.println((new java.util.Date()).getTime()+"");
if( isByteApache( "300" ) )
throw new IllegalStateException("problem");
if( !isByteApache( "5" ))
throw new IllegalStateException("problem");
if( isByte( "300" ) )
throw new IllegalStateException("problem");
if( !isByte( "5" ))
throw new IllegalStateException("problem");
if( isByte( "-300" ) )
throw new IllegalStateException("problem");
if( !isByte( "-5" ))
throw new IllegalStateException("problem");
2093ms for the first loop and... 90ms for the second one => 25 times
faster!
Thank you again :-)
Lo�c
> ps: If you should read something about Knuth, read only his most famous
> quote. really.
Which is...? (the title please)
> With Joe, you're taking the optimization step by the wrong end IMHO
What do you mean by this? Tell me please :-)
Extranet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 07/11/2002 17:19
Veuillez r�pondre � [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour : ant-dev
cc :
Objet : Re: R�f. : RE: R�f. : Re: Commons Validator
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Well it's just about 8% faster:
[...]
ah.
Byte.parseByte(String) is faster, you avoid an allocation.
Byte.parseByte(String, 10) is even faster you avoid a method call
int i = Integer.parseInt(s, radix);
return !(i < Byte.MIN_VALUE || i > MAX_VALUE)
is even more faster. you avoid a method call and and an exception
and yet I suggest to copy/paste the Integer.parseInt method and use your
own
by remove the exceptions to make it even more faster by removing yet
another
method call and exception.
>ps: don't have the time to make a patch (sorry)
I see. Time problem.
ps: If you should read something about Knuth, read only his most famous
quote. really.
With Joe, you're taking the optimization step by the wrong end IMHO
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.
---------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le
"message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses
destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce
message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce
message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion
ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas
d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses
filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce
message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
