Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually I think that it fixes a bug, rather than be a RFE, since it aligns behaviour with the normal property task.
The same has been said about <ant>'s inheritall="false", but still we've kept the "buggy" behavior as the default.
Ok.
I don't see though what feature can be attained from "relying" on the XmlProperty failing for file not existing. Can you please post a use-case to compare with mine?
<!--
=======================================================================
Apache Ant own build fileCopyright (c) 2000-2003 The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.
======================================================================= --> <project default="main" basedir=".">
<!-- Give user a chance to override without editing this file
(and without typing -D each time it compiles it) -->
<property file=".ant.properties"/>
<property file="${user.home}/.ant.properties"/>--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
