Christoph, >> Although I have a question about the Object editor we will >> use? Are we >> wanting to stick with the table style or do we want something more?
> >Yes, I kind of really like the TableStyle, because it's most flexible and >fast - so the editors should be somehow TableCellEditors...! I'll get to work on it shortly. I would like to see if I can add a property completion feature, much like code compeltion in many IDEs. This would allow the user to type in a $ which would bring up a list of properties defined in the build file. Shouldn't slow the system down, and I would a way to turn it off if unwanted. Let me know. >Regarding WebStart: > >I did not really expect, that this could become a problem... We, at IMPRESS, >made the best experiences with signed Applications, even with a simple >keytool signiture... Have you tried? yep, and it worked just fine if I really didn't want to run my build file from inside Antidote. Infact it was my preferred way of starting up Antidote for quick changes. >I see the WebStart-Vesion as somkind of sneak-peak and demo purpose mainly, >so I to not see a big Problem if the classpath is not changable during >runtime - what do you think? I agree, but if somebody could find away to change the classpath that would be great! Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
